http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/11/131119193624.htm
- Ester M. Nakamura-Palacios, Rodrigo S. M. Souza, Maria P. Zago-Gomes, Adriana M. F. de Melo, Flávia S. Braga, Tadeu T. A. Kubo, Emerson L. Gasparetto. Gray Matter Volume in Left Rostral Middle Frontal and Left Cerebellar Cortices Predicts Frontal Executive Performance in Alcoholic Subjects. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 2013; DOI: 10.1111/acer.12308
3. I would say that its very supported and very nurtured throughout the site and the sources have medical backing with Clinical & Experimental Research, as proof. I believe that the argument is more of statement which doesn't require a response, because of this it would be hard to argue that Alcoholism doesn't effect the frontal cortex.
4. the author has a lot of research and data with proof, it would be really hard to disprove her argument. Its very easy to accept her argument that was presented
5. when reading the website, I noticed that the site is very short compared to other websites, its very compact and very informative, its straight to the point and doesn't stray from the topic. On one paragraph they used some results that will be published in the April 2014, which is very recent. this doesn't change my thought of using this site.
6. I would say that it derives from a medical standpoint with medical definitions and MRI images that have great value to the sources and it usefulness to my paper i would use this with out a second thought.
7. when looking at the genres I noticed that we as humans still use most of the currents definitions, I would make sure that i would provide examples to make sure that I am not changing the genre.
8 This sources has several prime examples and a strong source to help me with my purpose I personally don't think I will have any problems while using this site in my paper.
9. I am very likely to use this site and sources in the website for a source cited page
1. A. I. Leshner, "Science-Based Views of Drug Addiction and Its Treatment," Journal of the American Medical Association 282 (1999): 1314~1316
(jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=191976).
2. This site offers information on why people do drugs and the nature of addiction, Its very important to know the reason why people use and the understanding of addiction in a real like form, making it tangible would give a different feel to the paper, with a proper understanding and some history, implication of the five W's; what?, when?, where?, why?, who? into the paper giving it some back bone.
3. I don't think its very well supported, but i do like the information of understanding the nature addiction to help show the correlation of people who might be at risk.
4. What I learned is that when the word addiction came around people thought that it was the process of taking lots of drugs, later they realized that its more of the impulsive behavior that becomes uncontrollable over time, which leads people to seek and use drugs or alcohol.
5. This article was published in 1999, due to that information I personally believe that its too old to use. when you look at the types of new drugs on the market and other types of ways to indigestion them and the effects that they have on people I would prefer to use another site.
6. I would have to say that the medical jargon is hard to understand you almost need a PH.D to understand the terms and definitions. I think that you should break things down enough to help the readers really grasp the concepts.
7. I think that it speaks to a certain crowd pertaining certain information, I don't think that most people would read this source to get a full understanding of addiction and the effects that it causes. I would in slang terms dumb it down to reach the readers and give them the clear idea of the topics
8. I don't think this would be a good source to use in the my project, Its not very long and its some what hard to read.
9. I will not be using this site or source in my paper.
1. Source: Frontier C, Keane TM, Leritz E, et al. Widespread Effects of Alcohol on White Matter Microstructure. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research. 2014.
2. I noticed that some of the information on this site is almost common knowledge, I have seen most of this information in classes at the college level. I have heard many teachers and professors lecture on this type of information so i believe it to be true and accurate.
3. The line of argument is so strong in this website that I would have a hard time arguing against it. I like the personal stories of the gentleman on the site, if you saw it you would understand personal stories of bouts of alcoholism makes it real.
4. I learned that drinking beyond the age of 50 can cause permanent brain chemistry to change, it is possible if the recovery of tissue of the left inferior frontal gyrus with maintained abstinence in those alcoholics who successfully stopped drinking prior to their fifth decade," Fortier said
5. I would have to say that the date is fairly new and I would use it, its with in a two year mark and very informational.
6. I think that the person did some research, I believe that they really looked up good data to implicate in their online site.
7. I dont see a problem in this piece of information, other than it could be longer and broken down more in understandable words.
8. I think that this piece would work and show data that would argue my point, not only is alcohol bad but it destroys regardless of age. When you have long periods of no (USE) you will heal at some level
9. I will use this sources
No comments:
Post a Comment